As I listened to the debate
between Senators Barak Obama and John McCain yesterday, I heard Senator McCain regurgitate
his twice-told tale about the Federal Government’s “pork barrel-spending” on
the Grizzly bears’ DNA in northwest Montana. The project, which tracks and studies
the grizzlies, has come under attack by McCain several times before. So I thought perhaps, this time, I needed to
defend this project since I believe in Science and the Scientific Method. And, from that perspective, my instincts as a
Microbiologist are the same as any wild-life Biologist.
Let me say, from the onset,
that I’m not questioning McCain’s rhetoric about “pork barrel-spending” as a
whole. I understand he wants to become
our next president and this is his way of selling the American public his
version of wasteful spending—which I largely understand. So, why don’t I view Federal spending on “bear
or seal DNA” or for that matter “studying the mating habits of crabs” as
pork-barrel spending? Because such
requests are fundamental to basic scientific research; without funding such research,
science in the US
as we know it cannot advance. Requests
such as these may sound dumb, trivial or unclear to non-scientists, but to
Biologists, what may be “trivial” or “unclear” is fundamental and incremental to
basic scientific research. It adds to
our collective pool of knowledge that benefit everyone in the long run.
Little discoveries add up and
lead to major and exciting ones. And one
could never know the impact of what, at the time, appears to be a trivial piece
of research on the future of science.
One such case was Gregor Mendel’s studies of heredity in garden
peas. Initially, his paper was ignored,
even by the likes of Charles Darwin. Years
after his death, Cytologists working on the behavior of chromosomes during Meiosis
saw a link between the behavior of these chromosomes and Mendel’s forgotten work. Suddenly his obscure writings led to a whole
new scientific field that we call Genetics.
In the early 1950’s, James Watson and Francis Crick discovered the
structure of DNA, a discovery which was based largely on their careful analysis
of existing scientific research. Their “humble”
1953 landmark paper in the Journal Nature,
bridged our understanding of Genetics and led to the birth of Molecular Biology,
a field that revolutionized modern Biology and Medicine. Our medical advances today, including
treatment methods for cancer, benefit us all, and undoubtedly, not too long ago
saved the life of at least one United States Senator.
So now back to the Grizzly
bear of northwest Montana . Why are they so important to wild-life
Biologists? For one, because they are
listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act. That means, the Grizzly could one day become
extinct. These bears roam a land area of
Montana that
is almost 8 million acres in size so studying them is a monumental and
expensive challenge. Because of human
encroachment on their habitat, these bears are under extreme stress, and so
understanding their distribution is a management issue that can lead to our
mutual co-existence and their long-term survival, and even, perhaps, their
eventual removal from the Endangered Species list. The study of their DNA also provides us with
a better understanding of their fundamental behavior at the molecular level and
allows us to better manage their population.
Protecting bears is, in essence, a way of protecting their habitat and
ours – and making them and us safer. While
some of the work may be done by unpaid volunteers, the project still requires expensive
equipment and dedicated scientists who can think through the tedious minutia of
this research. One such challenge is counting the Grizzly population. Because it is impracticable to count bears face
to face (since they’re hiding in the woods and can be dangerous when
encountered); scientists resort to other methods including collecting bear hair
samples left on tree bark or food traps. Since each bear’s DNA is distinct, analyzing
the hair’s DNA is one sure way of counting unique individuals within this
population. So far, scientists are
encouraged that the Grizzly population is recovering.
Interestingly, the bill that
McCain criticizes was advocated by the former Montana Senator, Conrad Burns, a
Republican who’s now the Chairman of McCain’s campaign in Montana .
McCain ended up voting for that very Bill most likely because getting
the Grizzly off the endangered species list opens the door for drilling on
federal land.
And what about the mating
habits of crabs and the DNA of harbor seals? It was Sarah Palin, as Governor of
Alaska, who actually requested federal funds for this research.